In my first blog I said one of the ways I cope with
the stress of my caring responsibilities is to try and see the lighter side of
situations. When it comes to getting equipment and adaptations via the
occupational therapy (OT) service this is definitely my default setting. I am
therefore writing this blog slightly tongue-in-cheek, it is not meant to insult
any readers from the OT profession but it serves my need to wonder about how a
service has become so complicated for those of us who need to use it.
For me the first hurdle I face is to work out if I
need an Occupational Therapist employed by health or one employed by social
care. Recently I discovered that my
parents were both sleeping in their recliner chairs as they can no longer
easily get on and off their bed. So when
my mother went to see her GP about the x-rays of her back I suggested she ask
for a referral to a health OT for an assessment of their sleeping arrangements.
(I have somehow assumed beds are the domain of health.) Coupled with this they
need to be assessed to get on and off the toilet. In the past it is the social
care OT who has provided grab rails and bathroom equipment. I now lie awake at
night wondering if beds are health are toilets and bathrooms social care or do
we really need two different OT’s involved. I wonder if there is a rule book
somewhere that delineates which equipment / rooms in the house/ bodily
functions belong to health and which belong to social care. Or I should ask the
question does it matter?
In the cold light of day, of course it matters.
Health is free at the point of delivery and social care is not. But then there
is the joint equipment service, which I thought had been introduced to deal
with the confusion as to who provides what.
As I understand it, and I may be wrong, this provides pieces of
equipment which cost less than £100 and can be accessed by either health or
social care. The difficulty is how do I know before the assessment whether the
equipment needed will cost less than £100 so I am left with my original
question do we need a health or social care OT. This morning matters became
further complicated when my mother informed me that the CPN was referring my
father to an OT who specialises in dementia.
I now have visions of 3 OT’s all assessing different rooms or perhaps
the same rooms of my parent’s home. How did the situation become so complicated
or is it just complicated to those of us on the outside?
During the 30 years of my daughter’s life I have
become used to OT’s, their technicians, equipment reps and surveyors traipsing
in and out of my house. My daughter attended a special school which was just
outside the boundary of the city we live in.
This meant that she had 3 OT’s – a local authority OT for equipment at
home, a different local authority OT for equipment at school and a health
OT. This lead to some bizarre
situations, particularly if we needed a piece of equipment which had been made
for her at school made for her in the home.
It involved 2 OT’s and 2 technicians – a simple ladder back-chair took
so long to co-ordinate and make that by the time it arrived (9months later) she
had grown out of it. Whenever, people used to say that there was a national
shortage of OT’s, I used to smile and think, well that is not surprising my
daughter has three.
We are in the midst of having our home assessed for
a more suitable bathroom arrangement for my daughter. This process has become akin to the game of
‘Chinese whispers’ that I played as a child (the final message whispered along
a row of children bears no relationship to the original message). This process
started with a visit from the health OT as my daughter’s scoliosis had
progressed so she needed all her seating reassessed. It was agreed that instead
of the tilting commode / shower chair she needed a moulded commode / shower
chair to support her spine. A number of
reps then followed bringing equipment to try out and the outcome of that was we
would need a new bathroom as the turning circle for a moulded chair was larger.
The health OT then submitted a report to the social care OT, who visited and
agreed that is what was needed. She then went off and spoke to the surveyors in
the city council and came back for a visit with a surveyor.
By this stage the surveyor was convinced that what
was needed was a tilting moulded commode and that we would be wheeling her
around the house in a tilted position. No amount of talking could convince him
that the messages had become muddled so he walked around the house measuring
access and turning circles that would require that we live in a sports stadium!
He proposed knocking down walls that we had no desire to see knocked down and
in the end agreed that he would draw up some plans but he would come back for
another visit with the health OT who had started the process and the rep from
the equipment company. Perhaps when we have all the appropriate people in the
same room at the same time we may get some sense – but what a lot of wasted
time and left us asking the question – who’s house is this, anyway?
It has taken us over 6 months to get the lounge
chair that was needed during this reassessment process. The hold up was the
fact that the new clinical commissioning group could not agree a process for
approving the funding and then commissioning a private company to purchase the
chair. Strangely enough, it was all sorted out the same week that I made a
complaint! The light on the horizon is that I have now been told that as my
daughter is 100% continuing care funded and has a personal health budget I can
get her equipment approved and paid for via her budget. A new route to try with the purchase of her
commode?
I could go on forever sharing the stories I have
about equipment and adaptations, but wanted to give my readers a flavour of the
dilemma of so many carers and disabled people when trying to work out whether
one needs a health or social care OT. Government talks about the integration of
health and social care and I share this dream in relation to the OT services; but
I would like to ask when is this going to happen as I would like to stop lying
awake at night wondering whether it is health or social care.
If you would like to comment, share your experience
or answer some of my dilemma’s please comment or tweet.
I knew it was bad, but this is horrendous, not to be mention the invasion of your privacy. It sounds like it is something that you have had to get used to. Interested to know how it turns out...perhaps you should meet in the surveyors home next time!
ReplyDeleteThis makes me so mad! I am an OT who when working in the health system tried to work towards an in-reach OT service so that patients seeing an OT in the community would have the OT see them in hospital to stop all this unnecessary over assessment! needless to say the powers that be didn't think it would be responsive enough and it was dropped :( I still believe that someone should have just one allocated OT who pulls in specialist advisers from other OT's as and when required, so that the Client only has one person to work with who communicates and coordinates whatever is required. This would then free up OT's to see other people and then there may be more of us to go around!! Rant over!
ReplyDelete